当日発送
送料無料

100％品質 ■Uniformly 著■ Lyle Particles■Stephen Charged Accelerating 物理学

お気に入りブランド

クチコミ評価 5.3（25件）

販売価格：: ￥12540税込
獲得ポイント：: ポイント

商品がカートに追加されました

販売価格：￥12540 税込

お買い物を続けるカートへ進む

在庫あり

※ 商品のお届けについてはこちらよりご確認ください。

SHOPPING が販売、発送いたします。

当日発送可 (14:00までのご注文が対象)

※
ご注文内容・出荷状況によっては当日発送できない場合もございます。
詳しくはこちらよりご確認ください。

利用可

※
ポストにお届け / 一点のみ購入でご利用可能です。
ゆうパケットでのお届けの場合はサンプル・ノベルティが対象外となります。
ゆうパケットには破損・紛失の保証はございません。
詳しくはこちらよりご確認ください。

商品の詳細

Back in1954, a paper[2] by Bondi and Gold was to pick upona much olderqu- tion and raise anew one that would trigger another longdebate. The old question hadbeenaroundsince the beginning of the twentiethcentury, whenBorn?rstraised it[1] and others followed suit. This was the question of whethera uniformly acc- erated charge (in?at spacetime) would radiateelectromagnetic energy. The new question arose from the claim by Bondi and Gold that (inthe contextof general relativity now)a static charge ina static gravitational ?eld cannot radiateenergy. If this were the case, thenaparticular version of the equivalence principle would thereby be contradicted. This book reviews the problem discovered by Bondi and Gold and discusses the ensuingdebate ascarried on by Fulton and Rohrlich [3], DeWitt and Brehme [4], Mould [5], Boulware [6], andParrott [7].Various solutionshave been proposed by the above (and otherswhoare not discussed here). One of the aims here will be to putforward arather different solution to Bondi and Gold's radiation problem. So eventhough the paperscited are discussed to a large extent in chronological order, the reason for writing this is not justto produce an historical reference. Andeven though the version of general relativity applied hereis entirely consensual, every one of these papersis criticised on at leastoneimportant count, soI suspectthat the resultas a whole should not be described asconsensual.